Calicut Crash – More Questions than Answers Remain

Table-top-runway-frog's-eye-view Image Courtesy InformedAviator

What must be investigated thoroughly is the environment in which the accident has occurred

More than one month has elapsed since the tragic accident involving an Air India Express Boeing 737 NG aircraft that crashed while landing in inclement weather in Calicut. However, instead of answers, more questions about the crash remain.

Air India Express flight IX-1344 flying from Dubai to Calicut carrying 191 passengers, skidded off a tabletop runway, fell into a gorge and suffered catastrophic damage, or what is termed as ‘Hull Loss’ in aviation terms. Twenty passengers, including the two pilots, lost their lives.

Click the link below to watch a video that gives an accurate account of the accident. Video Courtesy – DW

No Preliminary Finding Report

Fortunately for the investigation, the ‘Black Box’, which comprises of the DFDR (Digital Flight Data Recorder) and the CVR (Cockpit Voice Recorder) were recovered undamaged from the debris. Analysis of these is fairly simple process for a technically qualified person. It was expected that the AAIB would come out with an official preliminary finding report, or statement soon after the accident.

However, no formal statement has been issued by the AAIB or the Probe Panel, leaving the door open for speculative analysis by unqualified ‘chair-borne’ experts on social media and even poorly qualified journalists.

image of calicut crash
Wreckage of Boeing 737 of Air India Express that crashed in Calicut

Instead of acting with restraint and patience, many were eager to do their own analysis, and categorize the accident prematurely. The Director General of Civil Aviation himself suggested that it was probably a case of ‘Pilot Error’ even before the probe panel was set up. The statement was extremely unfortunate.

To read a post on a clarion call to reform the DGCA, CLICK HERE

Many senior pilots articulated their angst at this. Do read one such post which urges all to ‘Not Blame the Pilot Just Yet’, CLICK HERE

Formation of the Probe Panel

On August 13, a five-member panel was set up to probe the accident, headed by Captain SS Chahar, a former examiner on Boeing 737 NG. His team members include Mr Ved Prakash (Operations Expert), Mr Mukul Bhardwaj (Senior Aircraft Maintenance Engineer of B737), Group Captain YS Dahiya (Aviation Medicine Expert), and Mr Jasbir Singh Larhga (Deputy Director AAIB).

What was surprising was that the panel had only one member from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. The AAIB was set up primarily to carry out investigations in aircraft accidents, on similar lines of the NTSB in the USA.

The AAIB has a regular workforce of seven safety personnel and an independent panel of 23 pilots and cockpit crew, 12 engineers, four aviation operation experts, two experts each for aviation psychology and aerodrome and one expert each as In-Flight Safety personnel and air safety investigator. These 46 experts, that comprise of the AAIB were empanelled in October 2018.

Before the formation of AAIB on July 30, 2012, the DGCA used to investigate all the air accidents. However, a committee formed by the government in the 1990s, under the Chairmanship of Air Marshal JK Seth, stated that the DGCA couldn’t be a prosecutor, a jury and judge in a case against its own. International air safety norm also, to which India is a signatory, mandates the separation of investigation and regulation.

Human Factors

In the opinion of our contributors, an accident cannot be seen in isolation as a result of one causal factor. A catastrophic accident is a result of the a large number of variables all failing simultaneously, and thus aligning the ‘Holes in the Cheese’ (For more on this concept that was first conceptualized by James Reason, CLICK HERE)

Check out the following links to read the best books on Human Factors in Aviation

To read an opinion on whether it is acceptable to blame the pilots when they are not present to defend themselves, CLICK HERE

Calicut Runway and Environment

What must be investigated thoroughly is the environment in which the accident has occurred. The following points about the airfield merit thought:-

View of Calicut Runway. Closer Runway end is Runway 28. Image Courtesy Indian Express

Calicut is a tabletop runway, close to the coastline. One may be able to understand a tabletop runway in a hill station, but right next to the coastline, why should a runway be located on a tabletop?

Meteorological Forecast

Calicut experiences extreme monsoon conditions

When all these environmental factors are combined with inclement weather, a recipe for disaster is already brewing. It is no secret that Calicut experiences extreme monsoon conditions.

There was heavy rain in Calicut at the time of the accident and the weather had been inclement for the last few days. Standing water on the Runway in case of a heavy downpour increases the chances of Aquaplaning. This is probably the core issue in the accident which has accentuated the deficiencies already present at the airfield. The probe panel must deliberate on the prevalent weather and the time of the crash.

Calicut experiences extreme monsoon conditions Image Courtesy Informed Aviator

The meteorological forecast which the pilots receive when they prepare their plan to land as compared to the actual weather is another story altogether. The accuracy of these forecasts is suspect at most times and pilots have to decide on / or revise their landing plans only when they come close to the airfield and assess the weather conditions on their own.

As per many senior pilots who have landed at Calicut, this is a routine occurrence.

Endnote

In the opinion of InformedAviator, a thorough look needs to be taken at the runway and airfield environment at Calicut. The probe panel needs to come out with a preliminary finding report, to keep a check on speculative analysis by unqualified and self styled experts.

What do you think about the accident? Please leave a comment and let us know.

Share this
Exit mobile version